This week's readings of "Monsters and the Moral Imagination" and Grimley's "Frankenstein" really hit home with me. First before I go into the main topic of my post, I wanted to say that I enjoyed reading this comic version of Frankenstein. I have always had a hard time reading the original story, I always got dragged down in the language. The imagery helped to give life to the psychological and moral challenges presented in the story.
In the "Monsters and the Moral Imagination" article, Asma points out that perhaps there has been an increased interest in monsters and mayhem due to turmoil in the society. Especially as we are going through this COVID-19 crisis, I wonder if there is going to be even more of an interest in monsters and mayhem. Asma said, "monsters can stand as symbols of human vulnerability and crisis. Part of our fascination with serial-killer monsters is that we (and our loved ones) are potentially vulnerable to sadistic violence." In a crisis such as what has been going on with the virus, people are more prone to become these monsters. A week and a half ago, a man came driving down my main street that I live on and killed his ex wife and shot one of my neighbor's teenage son dead. I drove down the road five minutes after this all occurred. This made me think, what would I have done if I had been directly involved? Also, what makes someone turn into a sadistic monster? As I read Frankenstein, I felt sympathy for the creature. The creature was not given the opportunity to learn right from wrong; it was the job of Victor to give him the foundation for a good life. Instead Victor spurned the creature leading to both of their downfalls. Society seems to spurn people that are different and it is society who helps to make the monsters real and imaginary.
Image Source: https://allthatsinteresting.com/serial-killer-quotes
OMG Sadie, that is so scary. I'm glad you are OK. I'm not sure I can actually respond in any substantive way to what you are pointing to because OMG SCARY. I guess the question that I am left with (based on the etymology that I shared on Kelsey's post) is this: when does an act of violence turn into something meant to show or teach us something? Can a monster only be fictional - because a monster is designed, created as a warning, in a way that no actual person or being can be?
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteOh my gosh Sadie that's terrifying - I'm glad you're alright!!
ReplyDeleteI think you touch on something very interesting in this post: it was Victor's job to teach the creature the difference between right and wrong. And you're absolutely right; instead of us judging the creature for its misconceptions of what is "normal," we should think of the circumstances in which it was created and the fact that it really doesn't even know what the world is like. I'd say that certainly gives him an unfair disadvantage at living in this world, and as its creator, Victor absolutely needed to take responsibility for it and take the time out to show it how to survive. Victor left the door wide open for the creature to potentially turn into something monstrous.
(I had a typo in the first attempt at a comment and it drove me crazy so I deleted it)
The situation you mentioned was crazy. I am sorry all of this happened. Some people handle life events in a toxic way, and it is quite unfortunate. Victor should have lead Frankenstein into a better path. Frankenstein has good potential. Any good points to Frankenstein is probably from him learning things on his own, getting an idea for how things work.
ReplyDelete